Fix the record.
Send the page URL, exact statement, reason it may be inaccurate and a current primary source.
Send corrections, platform updates and editorial feedback to the Limist research team.
Send the page URL, exact statement, reason it may be inaccurate and a current primary source.
Include the feature, effective date and official documentation or visible product evidence.
Tell us which reader question remains unanswered or which comparison would become clearer.
Limist cannot place candidates, recover platform accounts, accept job applications or mediate hiring disputes. Contact the relevant employer or platform for those requests.
For a factual correction, identify the exact sentence or score and explain what changed. For a product update, provide the effective date and link to official documentation. For editorial feedback, describe the reader decision that would become clearer.
Do not send passwords, account credentials, identity documents, private application materials or sensitive personal information. Limist needs product evidence, not access to your account.
The editorial team checks the cited page against current primary sources and the published methodology. A factual change may update text, score and review date. A methodological disagreement may be addressed with clearer context even when the score remains unchanged.
Limist does not recruit for the platforms in its index, submit applications, recommend individual candidates or investigate private employment disputes. Questions about an account, subscription, listing or employer should go to the organization that controls that service.
The inbox is designed for evidence that can improve published research: product documentation, correction sources, broken links, changed access terms and clearly scoped feedback about reader decisions.