Why Indeed ranks here.
Indeed is powerful for breadth. It finishes lower because Limist gives more weight to remote-specific curation, location clarity and signal quality than to raw inventory.
Limist treats Indeed as a supporting board. The score reflects the remote-search experience rather than the platform's total business, audience size or brand strength. A candidate in a narrow occupation or country may reasonably reach a different conclusion.
The strongest use case
Job seekers who need maximum breadth across occupations and locations. In that context, the platform's filters, listing format and audience can reduce the time between discovery and a credible application.
The main tradeoff
The scale and aggregation model create more duplicate, stale and inconsistently labeled remote results for candidates to verify.